That’s what the meme is. But the user’s calculation multiplies 1-x by 0, not 1-x by half the population. Or by the future expected value.
- 4 Posts
- 13 Comments
I am not seeing it. Are you saying the last person chooses between killing nobody and killing the entire population? Also, what about the intermediary likelihoods of pulling the lever?
Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled hips yearning to swing freely
LanguageIsCool@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•The Future of Advertising Is AI Generated Ads That Are Directly Personalized to YouEnglish
8·7 days agoWe think with ad blockers we’re shielded by ads and to some degree, we are. At least we don’t have to see the abominations. But ads are insidious. They echo. We can block the actual ads but we live in a reality that is molded by ads. They’re massive coordination mechanisms that alter our shared culture. They push the masses into lifestyles and into brands. We can still shield ourselves, to some degree, from being influenced by all of this. But we can’t really escape a world where a brand not only is a product but also a symbol.
LanguageIsCool@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Always question those who are the "teachers"
9·10 days agoSeriously lol. “My PE teacher is fat therefore education is worthless. I’m very intelligent.”
LanguageIsCool@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Always question those who are the "teachers"
242·10 days agoThis is the same kind of smug stupidity that enables shit movements like MAGA. Science bad! Education bad! Vaccines bad! Teachers bad!
LanguageIsCool@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Always question those who are the "teachers"
51·10 days agoCan you give an example of it being used for different reasons?
LanguageIsCool@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Always question those who are the "teachers"
1·10 days agoHoly shit, this user is extremely intelligent
LanguageIsCool@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Always question those who are the "teachers"
101·11 days agoIt’s a way to minimize educators and you know it lol
Lol this is f*nny. Fuckin h*rmonicas.
Edit: my asterisks italicized the thing, whoops lol
Got it! So you’re saying that the last choice is between 233 or 0 and the last guy has a probably x of pulling the lever and killing everyone (therefore a (1-x) probability of killing nobody).
So, even if it’s guaranteed that nobody along the way pulls the lever (the best case scenario if we want 0 dead), the expected value at the last branch is x · 233 + (1-x) · 0. And the only way this is less than 1 is if x < 1 / 233, which is an absurdly tiny probability.
If we also consider the intermediary probabilities, this already tiny probability threshold of 1 / 233 of killing nobody gets SMALLER because we’re allowing more chances for killing way more than 1 person along the way.