Rather, ClockBench will end up improving AI in this regard over the next few years. This is because they need any AI benchmark to identify its strengths and weaknesses in order to improve it in future versions.

I feel that the non-profit OpenAI will end up with a similar fate to the Mastercard Foundation in the medium term. While OpenAI PBC is the publicly traded Mastercard.

Although that would make it the richest organization in the world.

I feel like the Cannes public will be like Anton Ego from Ratatouille and I only see two possibilities: it goes well or it goes badly.

“I think we are running out of low-hanging fruits to improve on,” says Xu. He added that the early agentic gains came from simple changes, “things like formatting errors, or not understanding tools […] I think we’re going to slow down until we find the next big thing.”

Another AI winter? Another AI winter? (Possible in the medium or long term)

Although we’ll also have to wait and see what John Carmack does, because he’s also involved in this.

As far as I know, Altman does not own any shares in OpenAI.

And what a good explanation you gave, although that is what happens in game theory, right? That normally the human being wants more despite the risk.

I don’t understand why Ed Zitron considers this a sign of the end of OpenAI.

Although I only see OpenAI, it seems confident that its IPO can break records.

Microsoft 🤝 Google

Narrowly avoiding antitrust cases

The best option I see for MongoDB is for In-Q-Tel (CIA) or the government to acquire the company.

If MongoDB changes its license back to AGPL it will be another comedy like Redis

But MongoDB had an AGPL license. Why did they decide to change to a more restrictive one?

Apparently you have to give your data to get the reports.