wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comexternal-linkmessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1217arrow-down110
arrow-up1207arrow-down1external-linkHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comwikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square52linkfedilink
minus-squaresalty_chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down26·1 month agoI don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 month agoTheir point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia. It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
minus-squareSckharshantallas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-229 days agoYou totally misunderstood the comment.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoBait used to be believable
minus-squaresalty_chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoYep, graduated!
I don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
Their point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia.
It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
You totally misunderstood the comment.
Bait used to be believable
deleted by creator
Yep, graduated!