• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is a bad move. The GPL license cannot be enforced on AI generated code.

    • terabyterex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Thats not true. The new article being shoved down lemmy’s throat is not correct. They site court cases and come to bad conclusions

        • terabyterex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          The copyright office never saif gpl could not be enforced. Thats s conclusion made. Hell even in what you linked the requirement for this is that ai had to be a “substantial” part. The linux teamsaid they would take submissions that were assisted but not all out generated. But to argue a point, lets pretend that an entire pull request was ai generated. That is only a small part of thr linux kernel since the kernel is what is licensed. A sma amount of uncopywrited code cant invalidate the whole project, which the license is on.

          But regardless, the copyright office never said anything about enforcement of gpl. T very clear said code with no meaningful human involvement, which isnt the case here. So nothing establishes what you said true. Its all leaping to comclusions that cant be leaped to.