• village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nobody knows this

      That’s because you made it up. Duration has no bearing on whether or not group sex is an orgy

    • Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What? No? My partner and I (before any of you judge we’re adults and responsible) got a bit of molly last week and had sex from like 2 am to 7 am. (Water and snack breaks obv).but if I had called that an orgy she would’ve laughed her self dry!

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They did by using the ambiguous word “it”.

          It’s irrelevant, though, because an orgy isn’t defined by duration.

          • tomi000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Youre trolling right?

            • Baguette is the tastiest bread
            • Baguette just means its very long
            • No a snake isnt a baguette

            Just to clarify I wasnt trying to say they were right about an orgy being defined by going on for a long time. Just that the reason for dismissing it was nonsense

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I’m honestly not sure what point you’re trying to make with the baguette stuff.

              They said “When it has been going on for very long.”

              What does ‘it’ mean? It can’t be an orgy because that’s what’s being defined. It could mean that an orgy is a gangbang that goes on for a while, but that really isn’t made clear at all.

              • tomi000@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Like I said, Im not trying to say the commenter was correct with their statement. But providing a counterexample thats not part of the discussion is not a counterexample at all (like a snake in a discussion about bread). The comment they replied to and the post itself were clearly about group-sex. Whatever specific word was meant to replace ‘it’ does not really matter imo.