I am a medical expert. I’m not trying to be overly pedantic but my point was that regular sea level air is around 21% oxygen so you were making it sound like the air at high elevations is higher than it is at sea level.
It’s not a wording issue. The link you posted has a table that says 100% O2 at sea level. Literally every single figure in the chart on that page is wrong because they list it as “%O2” instead of saying percent of baseline, which would be out of 21%. So at sea level you’re getting 100% of the normal oxygen in the air, which is 21%, and that declines, but the table is written incorrectly. It says that 8848 meters above sea level the content of air would be 33% oxygen. The table under that is more accurate.
It’s just a bad table and bad writing. Idk if I’m explaining any of this properly.
It’s good to get a medical expert to explain. I’m not sure I fully understand, however, I have noticed in the past 5-10 years, all the sites have slowly been moving away from the above graph (I can’t even find the other 2 sites that used to have it).
So, the evidence seems to suggest you’re right. but, wouldn’t surprise me if its bad writing. I generally use the info off Alan Arnette’s site instead. i just used this site because it had the table I was looking for, since I couldn’t find it elsewhere. But, seems like a personal blog, and the picture probably came off facebook lol
I am a medical expert. I’m not trying to be overly pedantic but my point was that regular sea level air is around 21% oxygen so you were making it sound like the air at high elevations is higher than it is at sea level.
It’s not a wording issue. The link you posted has a table that says 100% O2 at sea level. Literally every single figure in the chart on that page is wrong because they list it as “%O2” instead of saying percent of baseline, which would be out of 21%. So at sea level you’re getting 100% of the normal oxygen in the air, which is 21%, and that declines, but the table is written incorrectly. It says that 8848 meters above sea level the content of air would be 33% oxygen. The table under that is more accurate.
It’s just a bad table and bad writing. Idk if I’m explaining any of this properly.
It’s good to get a medical expert to explain. I’m not sure I fully understand, however, I have noticed in the past 5-10 years, all the sites have slowly been moving away from the above graph (I can’t even find the other 2 sites that used to have it).
So, the evidence seems to suggest you’re right. but, wouldn’t surprise me if its bad writing. I generally use the info off Alan Arnette’s site instead. i just used this site because it had the table I was looking for, since I couldn’t find it elsewhere. But, seems like a personal blog, and the picture probably came off facebook lol