The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoHe's an arboristlemmy.worldimagemessage-square122linkfedilinkarrow-up1622arrow-down16
arrow-up1616arrow-down1imageHe's an arboristlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square122linkfedilink
minus-squareundefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 days agoThat’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 hours agoNobody cares how long the limp branches are.
That’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
Nobody cares how long the limp branches are.
So… Non rigid?