“Experts in Europe warn that these devices are used to record strangers without their consent, possibly breaching EU law.”

“A small LED light is designed to indicate when recording is taking place, but RTBF’s investigators found that tutorials explaining how to conceal the indicator are abundant and easily accessible online.”

Sometimes I have a hard time deciding who I despise more, parasite Mark Zuckerberg or its witless hosts who keep using its products—yes, Zuck’s pronoun is it. Ban Ray-Ban, for frick’s sake.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s degrees of privacy. People don’t deserve to be recorded 24/7 just because they happen to be outside.

    • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      They don’t “deserve” to, but it is not illegal if they are. If you’re in a public space you shouldn’t expect privacy……because you’re in a public place. That’s pretty obvious.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Something being legal doesn’t make it morally correct and the rest of us should oppose this shit in every way we can, not simply expect it.

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oppose what, that you can be filmed or photographed without explicit consent when you’re in public?

          So if I go to the Eiffel Tower, I have to go and ask the hundreds of other people there if they consent to me taking their photo simply because they’re in my photo? Or if I see a criminal breaking into a house, I have to ask them if I can take their photo/video if I want to report them and hand over my photos/video to the police?

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Snapping a photo or video of your family or a landmark for your personal memories that happens to have some other people in the background is a hell of a lot different than sending a constant stream of everyone you’re looking at along with location data to Facebook, Google, the government, and whoever the fuck else. I shouldn’t have to explain this to you. And yes if you’re going to be uploading someones image online I do think you should have their permission.

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            22 hours ago

            creeps.

            the same creeps who can’t understand what the problem is. creeps filming women and girls without permission or consent.

            creeps like you apparently.

          • Darkonion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Perhaps your future camera could automatically fog any individual that you haven’t received prior consent from.

            And yes, I realise this idea has a number of technological requirements that may not exist yet, or cannot reliably exist ever, and requires the trusting of some authority in a world where noone of that esteem seem to be able to exist.