I’ll understand your point. And to make it clear, again, fascism needs!! to be stopped. But is not about “should we fight” but more “how should we fight?” Because if you (imho) break some basic rules, you wont be a fighter against facism but just another arsehole, just with good intentions. So: If violence against other people is necessary to fight fascism, why is it needed to humilate the beaten up enemy? Personal needs, like the feeling of revenge, might, superiority? Terrorizing other enemies?

Depends on the society you want to live in.

Its a “classy” way to eat a heated Bockwurst or Wiener in Germany. On of the few meals, that are often typically served with white toast bread.

Its more like be placed in the pillory to be publicly shamed

Im not obsessed that im correct. I think that uploading a picture of a teenager that is laying in his own bload (probably unconscious) after he got beaten up is wrong. Especially if its inteded to mock him. Now I am discussing this matter on lemmy. Who is wrong or right will be presumably never known.

Again, its not about fighting. Its about how you fight and what is necessary or just revenge

Depends on, but yeah. In some cases. I would defend even him

You can fight somebody with respect and without losing your morale standards.

I dont know how you define "sympathy*, but no, i have no sympathy for him

No, there are no metal gymnastics needed. There are some basics rights that should always be respected. Even if your fighting the big-time-nazi-scum-arseholes.

If every teenager who gives himself shity names is losing his dignity, there wont be much dignity left in the world to fight for Edit: And before you understand this wrong. Yes he is a teenage fascist arshole who needs to be fight back. But still, as I said in another comentary: In my opionion, nobody deserves to lose all his basic human rights. What ever he has done.

Ok, I think I dont understand your message completly. The sympathy he gets compared to the sympathy for the opponents of the genocide (gaza I assume?) On lemmy

He got none, they got some and rapidly increasingly more? Or whats your point there?

And how is this centristic?

Neutrality in case of your personal behavior to a person. I dont mean to not fight fascism or taking advantage of fascist.

Its not about not fighting back. Its about the way you fight back

In my opionion, nobody deserves to lose all his basic human rights. What ever he has done.

I dont judge you for beeing happy about the attack. I am judging a uploaded photo of a person laying on the floor, probably unconscious, in his own blood, with the intent of making fun of him

I felt several times and will certainly fall in the future. Thats human nature. But this wont keep me from believing in universial human rights

Staying neutral is totally fine, imho.

If you win a fight by losing all moral standards, I wouldnt call it a “win”

I probabaly used the wrong word. Respecting his dignity is probabaly better I asume