I actually switched from Action Laucnher to Nova because the former kept crashing.

Does anyone have recommendations to replace Nova?

While I agree with you, I wished that Mehta would entertain the idea of spinning Chrome into an independent company, even though it is still unclear to me how a browser company can generate revenue, especially to pay the salaries of the army of engineers working on Blink.

Aw, chucks

The author did not mention that you as a end user can customize rankings for every website and build custom searches (lenses), which are in my opinion the features that make Kagi unique and more useful than other meta search engines. And to my knowledge you cannot replicate those in SearNXG.

I think the more damning part is the fact that OpenAI’s automated moderation system flagged the messages for self-harm but no human moderator ever intervened.

OpenAI claims that its moderation technology can detect self-harm content with up to 99.8 percent accuracy, the lawsuit noted, and that tech was tracking Adam’s chats in real time. In total, OpenAI flagged “213 mentions of suicide, 42 discussions of hanging, 17 references to nooses,” on Adam’s side of the conversation alone.

[…]

Ultimately, OpenAI’s system flagged “377 messages for self-harm content, with 181 scoring over 50 percent confidence and 23 over 90 percent confidence.” Over time, these flags became more frequent, the lawsuit noted, jumping from two to three “flagged messages per week in December 2024 to over 20 messages per week by April 2025.” And “beyond text analysis, OpenAI’s image recognition processed visual evidence of Adam’s crisis.” Some images were flagged as “consistent with attempted strangulation” or “fresh self-harm wounds,” but the system scored Adam’s final image of the noose as 0 percent for self-harm risk, the lawsuit alleged.

Had a human been in the loop monitoring Adam’s conversations, they may have recognized “textbook warning signs” like “increasing isolation, detailed method research, practice attempts, farewell behaviors, and explicit timeline planning.” But OpenAI’s tracking instead “never stopped any conversations with Adam” or flagged any chats for human review.

Every developer wishing to offer applications on F-Droid will have to register their identities and package names to Google for Android devices to install their apps, regardless of the distribution platform (F-Droid, Obtainium, GitHub releases, etc.)

From my understanding, it will only allow apps that were registered, so since ReVanced uses identical package names to the patched apps, it probably won’t work unless they start using ReVanced-specific package names that are tied to their identity. But that would allow Google to block these package names (or ban ReVanced completely) if say, Spotify or YouTube complain about them.

Hopefully, the EU and other jurisdictions block this.

This is very similar to the notarization process Apple introduced to comply with the EU requirement of allowing third-party stores, and yet the EU doesn’t seem concerned (maybe because Apple did not allow third-party stores in the first place, will it be different for Google?)

I first read the original report from Android Authority thinking it would only be an additional hurdle for third-party stores and developers, but I’m now thinking that it would potentially block the use of ReVanced