(He/Him) | 🇬🇧

I like city building games and puzzles. I like other things as well, but that’s not important right now.


  • 1 Post
  • 210 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 12th, 2025

help-circle








  • This is actually so tricky. My instinct said “right hand side would be impractical, so no way” but then I remembered they evolved long necks to get to food so it makes sense to evolve arms there to better feed themselves.

    My little cope against this is:
    1. Centaurs use their arms to wield and craft weapons. This would make them much better suited for the left hand option, where they can try for body strikes against centaurs rather than just decapitation. It would also make them actually useful against any foes which aren’t birds.

    2. From an evolutionary and physiological standpoint, arms growing out of your neck is unrealistic. You don’t have the structural components to support it there - the neck is too busy supporting the head and it’s pretty crowded up there. Arms are typically attached to a broadened torso-skeleton, built to support lateral attachments as well as the longitudinal attachment of a head and neck.

    Edit: Ah, but it seems I haven’t paid enough attention to the illustration. Centaur on the right actually has a mega torso as it’s neck, which renders cope #2 as obsolete.

    Well, I find it hard to believe that the centiraffe would be forced to waste resources on growing a mega ribcage and mega long sternum like that. Also, it’s kind of just not “in the spirit of the game” - no longer does he resemble a giraffe, whose defining feature is the mega neck, but now he resembles just a very tall centaur. Horses are not short giraffes.

    Still going with option A.




  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldWacky
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Hey. That is NOT why abusive husbands punch their wives teeth out. Let’s get that clear. They just do that because they hate them, not because of some long winded scheme for sexual pleasure.

    I don’t think anyone has ever set out to remove their spouse’s teeth one by one via punches over the course of multiple years, and if they have then they probably killed them or scared them away before they got to the end goal


  • Or maybe all animals love being milked so there’s like a milk drive - much like human blood drives - where all who are able go to donate their milk. All the animal milks get mixed together in one big unhoky cornucopia vat of mammal juice. All nutrient combos blend together. The centre of Zootopian civilisation is their ritual milk drinking. All hail the milk mother. Mammalia Invicti




  • just plain copulation? Heck, we see that in the real world occasionally.

    I hate being reminded of this

    The Zootopia world may have less evolved equivalents of the multiple sapient species, and they may be OK with eating them. 2) You don’t see any humans in their world. Does that mean they’re not there? Longpig is said to be delicious…

    My headcanon now. It’s the only thing that makes sense, and any theory that solves 2 or 3 problems at once is likely to be true