Damn, I’m disappointed. I was hoping somebody suddenly invented the Frame-Shift Drive over-night.

Hmm…

• Daily porn actually gets boring. Porn will start to become “normal” and so you’ll get desensitised. Why would I want to desensitise myself from porn?
• No thank you. I like the occasional cocktail, but alcohol every day!? Ew no.
• I already do this. :)
• I get 8 hours sleep minimum. Can’t get less. I’ll die.
• My job involves biking… That’s technically not taking steps.
• I already don’t do this.
• That’s too bloody expensive! You think I have a tree that grows money!?

I pronounced it the Spanish way in my head.

Citation like that means it’s a hot topic. Doesn’t say anything about the quality of the research. Certainly isn’t evidence of lacking bias. And considering everyone wants their AI to be the first one to be aware to some degree, everyone making claims like yours is heavily biased.

It’s not a perspective. It just is.

It’s not complicated at all. The AI hype is just surrounded with heaps of wishful thinking, like the paper you mentioned (side note; do you know how many papers on string theory there are? And how many of those papers are actually substantial? Yeah, exactly).

A computer is incapable of becoming your new self aware, evolved, best friend simply because you turned Moby Dick into a bunch of numbers.

Sounds like you’re anthropomorphising. To you it might not have been the logical response based on its training data, but with the chaos you describe it sounds more like just a statistic.

So, this is just INS but with significantly smaller, finer measurements?

I’m pretty sure this’ll potentially reduce the error rate of INS, but not fully eliminate it.

I mean… teeeeechnically beef is what a giant bovine turns plants into.

Evan L is obviously taking the piss.

SSSSIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH…

Looks like I’ll have to prepare for yet another once-in-a-lifetime economic collapse.