10·
3 days agoI STILL don’t fucking know how to get row/column headings to work in Calc…
Have you tried with asking Copi…OUCH!!! /s
- 0 Posts
- 32 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
Cake day: December 14th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
But it’s up to the driver whether to allow
No. Doing public transport as a business means, it is public now and it must not be up to the driver’s mood anymore (within reasonable boundaries that should be defined by some law).
but I don’t see Uber being at any sort of fault here unless their policy is no animals
If it is about a neccessary service dog, then it’s not up to them (or their policy) to decide. At least, it shouldn’t be.
I don’t get it.
Others have paid billions in fines. Facebook, Cambridge Analytica for example. And we thought they were the super villains already.
These super villains here are doing the same, and worse, and they do it in the open, and they go free, and they are even praised for it.
A toast: Let’s all puke on them!
inevitable result of the fact that LLMs are mostly probabilistic engines
So we should better put the question like
“What is the probability of a D suddenly appearing in Connecticut?”
I’m afraid they don’t believe that either.
…and so they stand by and laugh about some stupid details while their democracy is teared down and cruel dictatory is built up right there before their eyes.
staffers could access sensitive user data
It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.
Tile mising some acters…
My fridge has one of these names now ;-)
You cannot make a certificate “single use” (except if it exists only inside a closed system).
What stops
Not useful to look at it in such a black or white manner. The possibilities are presumably less, and surely not that obvious.
Age check happens by trusted entity (your government, not some sketchy big tech ass), they create a signed cert with a short lifespan to prevent your kid using the one you created yesterday and without the knowledge which service it is for.
Sorry, not sufficient.
Not secure.
" I certify that somebody is >18, but I don’t say who - just somebody "
This is an open invitation to fraud. You are going to create at least a black market for these certificates, since they are anonymous but valid.
And I’m sure some real fraudsters have even stronger ideas than I have.
The whole world knows by now that these numbers are good for identifying people, and what a giant data privacy hole it is that they even exist.
So, no wonder, it had to happen sooner or later.
If it starts for real, the freedom of Android is lost.
We need to sue them 1000 times and more before they can even start this.
You are going to learn.
how
Not at all. The whole world knows that by now.
Some “Feds” who haven’t lost their jobs when it was time…? /s
LMAO of course they use that data for their AI training, now and forever (or maybe until the collapse of Usa as we know it), and they won’t even ask anymore.
I guess there is at least one person who should be fired urgently: the one who said that they don’t do that.