I hear you, and that’s the semantically correct term, but the issue transcends pure semantics. Considering the beauty standards set for women (thin, hairless, weak, what have you) it’d be foolish to not consider the idea that fetishizing qualities that signal (pre-pubescent) youth doesn’t have anything to do with pedophilia. Sugar babies / models tend to adhere to these standards, and billionaires tend to go for them.

It’s crazy how we’re not focusing on the borderline paedophilic 70 year old billionaire who just has to have 20 year old sugar babies

I’m cackling for this one folks

These are the WWII letters historians will be unearthing and deciphering a hundred years from now

Wow! Didn’t know I could get any more disgusted!

You a lesbian

On one hand: good for them. On the other: how are people this helpless

“Tenant admins will decide whether to enable it and require end-users to opt-in.”

If you require someone to opt-in, they’re no longer “opting in”

Don’t let Sam Altman know about this, his data centers about to have some upgrades /s

Now imagine my shock when I had done the swap from ChatGPT to Claude the day before the news about Anthropic’s (now backpedalled) deal. Anyway, I deleted ChatGPT and Gemini accounts and degoogled my life while I was at it.