I am live.
I don’t teach them that it’s ok to use bad words. I teach them there is a time and place for everything.
Which just does back to my original point. Killing in the name of self defense isn’t ok but acceptable.
Ok and accepted are two different things. The fact that you haven’t caught on to that and the fact that the producer of that meme thinks he’s a good person for simply not being a racist bigot isn’t the hot take you think it is.
Are you hearing yourself.
That is exactly what I’m suggesting. And so are the sources I provided.
But let me be clear. People who go slow on purpose in high speed areas are a danger for people trying to go faster. I’m not taking about people speeding recklessly. I’m talking people going 60 in a 70 or 20 in a 35. They cause other drivers to maneuver around them which could cause a situation.
Lol. Ya… Tracks.
It isn’t and you know it. I doubt very much they you go out of your way to swear in front of kids… Do you?
The best way to teach not only kids but pretty much anyone is through example. I don’t forbid my kids from swearing but I don’t swear in front of them.
I teach them there is a time and place for every word.
But saying “I swear in front of my kids but I’m not a racist” is just lazy. It’s basically saying “I’m just ok at what at I do because I’m kinda selfish”
“fuck you I won’t do what you told me”
Man… Always gets the blood boiling! Such a good song!
The post suggests that profanity is harmless because it is not as destructive as slurs or dehumanizing language. That comparison is flawed. Swearing may not carry the same moral weight as racism or bigotry, but that does not make it “good.” An act being less wrong than another does not make it right. Killing in self-defense is not celebrated as morally pure, it is tolerated as the lesser evil in a tragic circumstance. Likewise, profanity may be tolerated as less harmful than hatred, but it still coarsens language and weakens self-discipline. To hold children to a higher standard, one should avoid both the greater and the lesser corruptions of speech.
Why is Driving Slower than Other Vehicles Just as Dangerous as Speeding? https://share.google/U82ugU39Gc0XOa55G
A Few Slow Drivers Increase the Number of Accidents https://share.google/SUYjn8eEkNNLe5xBO
Slow Drivers: Dangers of Driving Slow | Allstate https://share.google/7GP2waFViHMUqEJYj
Some times you people don’t even know what you’re downvoting.
I think the issue is more or less slow drivers. One asshole is going 60 in a 70 in the left lane which caused people to pass them which in turn cause the cascade from the maneuvering around the slow person.
Slow drivers are far more dangerous than people don’t 10 15 over the speed limit.
Very interesting. I’ll have to inspect and research each of these sites, many I never knew about, in very close detail for the sake of science.
Uhuh. I see. Yes. Very interesting indeed.
Could you please provide the sauce? For scientific purposes of course.
You’d be surprised.
As a matter of fact, many well known and famous artists have been releasing dbrwnd new albums on old media for years and years.
For example I have a casset of 10000 days by tool.
I’m also an idiot audiophile with a stereo that’s way way too expensive for my own good. (I’m not rich but I am broke.)
I swear to God I can hear a difference and theres all kinds of warm fuzzy feelings when I put a casset in.
The longer I look at this the worse it gets.
Omg. That’s basically what I do…
Or at least did until I got a girlfriend with two kids. Now it’s just kids all the damn time.
I’ve watched despicable me like 90 fucking times.
For the love of God someone please help me.
LLMs aren’t artificial intelligence in any way.
They’re extremely complex and very smart prediction engines.
The term artificial intelligence has been co-opted in hijacked for marketing purposes a long time ago.
The kind of AI that in general people expect to see is a fully autonomous self-aware machine.
If anyone has used any llm for any extended period of time they will know immediately that they’re not that smart even chatgpt arguably the smartest of them all is still highly incapable.
What we do have to come to terms with is that these llms do have an application they have function and they are useful and they can be used in a deleterious way just like any technology at all.
That’s not a motte-and-bailey.
Yes. AI can be used for spam, job cuts, and creepy surveillance, no argument there, but pretending it’s nothing more than a corporate scam machine is just lazy cynicism. This same “automatic BS” is helping discover life-saving drugs, diagnosing cancers earlier than some doctors, giving deaf people real-time conversations through instant transcription, translating entire languages on the fly, mapping wildfire and flood zones so first responders know exactly where to go, accelerating scientific breakthroughs from climate modeling to space exploration, and cutting out the kind of tedious grunt work that wastes millions of human hours a day. The problem isn’t that AI exists, it’s that a lot of powerful people use it selfishly and irresponsibly. Blaming the tech instead of demanding better governance is like blaming the printing press for bad propaganda.
Yes. 👉👌