What’d you mean you people?

Hmmm. Then I would need to figure out how my authenticators would work. I have like 3 different ones for a total of like 18 accounts. It’s annoying as all hell

Wait no Firefox on iPhone? Fuck that I’m back in

I liked the whole not having to charge headphones thing more than anything.

This defeats the entire purpose of me having android

Like I’m just going to switch to an iPhone now. Not because Apple is any better, but because I have more family with them.

They took away our SD cards, they took away our removable batteries, they took away our headphone jacks. Now they’re taking away side loading apps, and that’s it. I’m done. The death of android.

It’s not a fetish, they’re the only people that want to go into politics.

At 25, when people are eligible, they have usually worked for a bit and politics isn’t on their mind.

Old people can also afford to fuck around with the economy more, they got theirs.

Hmmmmm.

I’ve thought about messing with it before, but now I really want to

Isn’t that… Just a bulky centaur?

Hey, Star-Trek technology did enable an actual utopia, so the modern corpofascist way of life would die kicking and screaming.

Be a shame if they struggled getting the electricity required to meet SLAs for businesses wouldn’t it.

I’m not arguing about regulation or lawsuits not being the way to do it - I was worried that it would get thrown out based on the wording of the part I commented on.

As someone else pointed out, the software did do what it should have, but Open AI failed to take the necessary steps to handle this. So I may be wrong entirely.

We should, criminaly.

I like that a lawsuit is happening. I don’t like that the lawsuit (initially to me) sounded like they expected the software itself to do something about it.

It turns out it also did do something about it but OpenAI failed to take the necessary action. So maybe I am wrong about it getting thrown out.

Ok that’s a good point. This means they had something in place for this problem and neglected it.

That means they also knew they had an issue here, if ignorance counted for anything.

Right, and because it’s a technical limitation, the service should be taken down. There are already laws that prevent encouraging others from harming themselves.

I agree. However I do realize, like in this specific case, requiring a mandated reporter for a jailbroken prompt, given the complexity of human language, would be impossible.

Arguably, you’d have to train an entirely separate LLM to detect anything remotely considered harmful language, and the way they train their model it is not possible.

The technology simply isn’t ready to use, and people are vastly unaware of how this AI works.

The “jailbreak” in the article is the circumvention of the safeguards. Basically you just find any prompt that will allow it to generate text with a context outside of any it is prevented from.

The software service doesn’t prevent ChatGPT from still being an LLM.

I agree. But that’s now how these LLMs work.

“Despite acknowledging Adam’s suicide attempt and his statement that he would ‘do it one of these days,’ ChatGPT neither terminated the session nor initiated any emergency protocol,” the lawsuit said

That’s one way to get a suit tossed out I suppose. ChatGPT isn’t a human, isn’t a mandated reporter, ISN’T a licensed therapist, or licensed anything. LLMs cannot reason, are not capable of emotions, are not thinking machines.

LLMs take text apply a mathematic function to it, and the result is more text that is probably what a human may respond with.

You know, in retrospect, you are totally right.