Get the fakata my lawn!

That’s a low bar…

When VPNs are paid to not get fined, and only distributors get fined, don’t blame me for not doing jackshit to contribute.

Your whining is music to my ears.

You’re not great at risk assessment, are you?

They have a risky move, which in 1/10000 cases leads to an illegal game being paid for through their payment platform.

And they have a safe move, where this never happens. Literally.

If the expected risk is positive in case 1, they will opt for case 2.

You must at least be able to understand this simple logic, right? If not, then I’m afraid this conversation is over because you’re not even remotely trying to understand their logic, and you’re just looking for a reason to be mad. Your irrationality makes me nauseous.

I’m not saying there is illegal content. Read my comment.

I’m saying the possibility of there being illegal content only exists if they allow the reintroduction of those titles. They’d need trust in the store moderation, in the lack of bad faith actors, in a lot of things.

And it would be an absolutely stupid business decision for them.

I am NOT condoning what they did, nor what they are doing. I am explaining, from their business perspective, why allowing potentially illegal content back on the platform is a non-argument and you cannot convince them otherwise.

They’re the ones at risk of losing money if they get sued by reintroducing said content. You’re not going to stop using the payment processors because there’s literally no other option. This is performative.