• 0 Posts
  • 38 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 10th, 2025

help-circle
  • https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship

    Extensive write up on this whole issue, even includes a calculator tool.

    But, basically:

    Yeah, going by angular resolution, even leaving the 8K content drought aside…

    8K might make sense for a computer monitor you sit about 2 feet / 0.6m away from, if the diagonal size is 35 inches / ~89cm, or greater.

    Take your viewing distance up to 8 feet / 2.4m away?

    Your screen diagonal now has to be about 125 inches / ~318cm, or larger, for you to be able to maybe notice a difference with a jump from 4K to 8K.

    The largest 8K TV that I can see available for purchase anywhere near myself… that costs ~$5,000 USD… is 85 inches.

    I see a single one of 98 inches that is listed for $35,000. That’s the largest one I can see, but its… uh, wildly more expensive.

    So with a $5,000, 85 inch TV, that works out to…

    You would have to be sitting closer than about 5 feet / ~1.5 meters to notice a difference.

    And that’s assuming you have 20/20 vision.

    So yeah, VR goggle displays… seem to me to be the only really possibly practical use case for 8K … other than basically being the kind of person who owns a home with a dedicated theater room.



  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldNo brainer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Even with a cooldown or something like that, a real world ‘blink’ ability, even of just 7 inches, would be utterly devastating in hand to hand combat, as well as potentially in ranged/armed combat as well.

    Just imagine scenes from John Wick but also, every 30 minutes, he can just ‘blink’ up to 7 inches to dodge or connect a punch, kick, grab, close range shot, move just a bit further into cover, closer to a magazine needed to reload, etc.

    Granted, you would also have to be very careful to not uh, Philadelphia Experiment / phase shift into a fucking wall or some other person or something.

    A 7 inch ‘blink’ takes Keanu Reeves a step from John Wick… toward Neo, this would be completely ‘broken’ in the hands of a skilled and trained fighter, even if they can only use it once a day, as a kind of ‘ultimate’ or w/e.

    Like uh, try hand to hand fighting someone in Cyberpunk 77, with yourself set up as close to a plain jane human as possible… up against a melee fighter with sandevistan.








  • True, true, sorry, my America-centrism is showing.

    Or well, you know, it was a formative and highly traumatic ‘core memory’ for me.

    And, at the time, we were the largest economy in the world, and that event broke our collective minds, and reoriented that economy, and our society, down a dark path that only ended up causing waste, death and destruction.

    Imagine the timeline where Gore won, not Bush, and all the US really did was send in a specops team to Afghanistan to get Bin Laden, as opposed to occupy the whole country, never did Iraq 2.

    Thats… a lot of political capital and money that could have been directed to… anything else, i dunno, maybe kickstarting a green energy push?






  • In case anyone is not aware:

    Are you currently employed?

    Have you actively sought a job in the last 4 weeks?

    If the answer to both of those questions is ‘no’, then congrats, according to the BLS, you are not unemployed!

    You just aren’t in the labor force, therefore you do not count as an unemployed worker.

    So yeah, if you finally get fed up with applying to 100+ jobs a week or month, getting strung along and then ghosted by all of them…

    ( because they are fake job openings that are largely posted by companies so that they look like they look like they are expanding and doing well as a business )

    … and you just give up?

    You are not ‘unemployed’.

    https://www.bls.gov/cps/definitions.htm#unemployed

    You are likely a ‘discouraged worker’, who is also ‘not in the labor force’.

    https://www.bls.gov/cps/definitions.htm#discouraged

    Also, if you are 5 or 6 or 7 figures in student loan debt, and… you can only find a job as a cashier? waiter/waitress? door dash driver?

    Congrats, you too are not unemployed, you are merely ‘underemployed’.

    But also, if you have too many simultaneous low paying jobs… you may also be ‘overemployed’.

    But anyway, none of that really matters if you do not make enough money to actually live.

    In 2024, 44% of employed, full time US workers… did not make a living wage.

    https://www.dayforce.com/Ceridian/media/documents/2024-Living-Wage-Index-FINAL-1.pdf

    (These guys work with MIT to calculate/report this because the BLS doesn’t.)

    You’ve also got measures like LISEP…

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswestfall/2025/05/27/stunning-unemployment-survey-says-millions-functionally-unemployed/

    Which concludes that 24.3% of Americans are ‘functionally unemployed’, by this metric which attempts to account for all the shortcomings of the BLS measures of the employment situation.

    Using data compiled by the federal government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, the True Rate of Unemployment tracks the percentage of the U.S. labor force that does not have a full-time job (35+ hours a week) but wants one, has no job, or does not earn a living wage, conservatively pegged at $25,000 annually before taxes.

    So basically this is a way to try to measure ‘doesnt have a job + has a poverty wage job’.

    https://www.lisep.org/tru

    A more useful measure of the actual situation for college grads, in terms of ‘did it make any economic/financial sense to get my degree?’ would be ‘are you currently employed in a job that substantially utilizes your specific college education, such that you likely could not perform that job without your specific college education?’

    Something like that.

    It sure would be neat if higher education in the US did not come with the shackles of student loan debt, then maybe people could get educated simply for the sake of getting educated, but, because it does, this has to be a cost benefit style question.

    • sincerely, a not unemployed but technically ‘out of the the labor force’ econometrician.




  • Yep I do realize that.

    And I still have the same opinion.

    You’re in the UK, so you’re not bound by GDPR… but a whole lot of places and orgs that are bound by GDPR realize that MSFT products indeed are a joke from a data security standpoint, and are actively transitioning to linux or at the very least FOSS software.

    I am in the US.

    I literally used to work for MSFT, a few of their different locations around Seattle.

    They are a fucking insane mess, internally, organizationally.

    I worked with people, old timers who’d just casually tell me:

    ‘Oh yeah back before Desert Storm, I was out in Saudi Arabia flashing the BIOS of computer hardware that was bound to be installed in Saddam’s C&C and Air Defense Radar networks, some months later when time came for the air sorties, somebody else just flipped a switch and down goes all their radars!’

    Aka a supply chain attack.

    Aka, unless your definition of ‘data security’ is ‘the NSA has all my data’, then MSFT products are rather dubious at providing data security.

    Like uh, did your org completely remove Copilot?

    … Are you sure about that?