• 0 Posts
  • 4 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 16th, 2023

help-circle

  • On the other hand, detrimental reliance is a tort and if someone is relying on an app for a specific safety function, the app could be civilly liable if it fails it’s function in some way.

    Yes, if the app would be any kind of official tool.

    Imagine if you had this attitude about an insulin use tracker/calculator, that sometimes gave wildly wrong insulin dose numbers.

    Yes, and that’s why regulations for those kinds of things exist, that prevent those things. There is no regulation for the ice tracker.

    Maybe down the road, it’s decided that aiding and abetting ICE is a crime, and providing misinformation intentionally or unintentionally is a criminal act. App developer dude could be criminally liable if he knew or ought to have known he had vulnerabilities. You know, in your New Nuremberg trials that you are going to get sometime in the next decade or so.

    If down the road a regulation would happen for, app developer dude would be forced to either comply or to stop operations.



  • Honestly, apart from the report being potentially wrong, the researcher seems pretty entitled as well. Like good intentions and all that, but he’s given him a week to fix the issue, usual practice in responsible disclosure are 90 days. We’re not talking about a company here, it’s some single random dude providing the app.

    This really sounds like some personal issue written down for public drama, while making himself ridiculous for not knowing his own shit properly.