• Zorcron@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        1 day ago

        No? I think it still looks fine. I think Pixar did pretty well in choosing what types of things they could get away with animating at the time with their early movies.

        • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          still looks decent, yeah, but modern animations just look way different. there’s something a little bit off about that maybe, though I can’t tell from a still image. that image might just be uniquely bad, i remember the movie being way more beautiful overall.

          • sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The contrast and how vivid it is look off from what I remember. Hardware for rendering has improved a lot since it came out. Maybe the animation masked the “simplicity” for lack of a better term.

      • vogi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        the unterwater parts arent even the worst, wait till you see the human renders again. they scared me for life even back then.

        spoiler